OTW's new R-10 Class WW1 sub kit

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jefftytoo
    SubCommittee Member
    • Mar 2003
    • 942

    #151
    Re: OTW's new R-10 Class WW1 sub kit

    Great, Steve! Congrats!

    Water sure looks better than I remember it!

    JeffP

    Comment

    • bigdave
      Junior Member
      • Feb 2003
      • 3596

      #152
      Re: OTW's new R-10 Class WW1 sub kit

      Very nice.
      Love the old boats. BD.
      sigpic"Eat your pudding Mr Land"
      "I ain't sure it's pudden" 20K

      Comment

      • salmon
        Treasurer
        • Jul 2011
        • 2342

        #153
        Re: OTW's new R-10 Class WW1 sub kit

        Steve,
        That looks really good! I look forward to the video! What a wonderful unique looking boat.
        Peace,
        Tom
        If you can cut, drill, saw, hit things and swear a lot, you're well on the way to building a working model sub.

        Comment

        • JWLaRue
          Managing Editor, SubCommittee Report
          • Aug 1994
          • 4281

          #154
          Re: OTW's new R-10 Class WW1 sub kit

          Steve,

          She looks really, really good in the water!

          Question: why are you looking to add weight in the bow? The shots you posted appear to show the sub running with a good trim attitude and the ballast tank allows the sub to fully submerge.

          -Jeff
          Rohr 1.....Los!

          Comment

          • steveneill
            SubCommittee Member
            • Jul 2009
            • 716

            #155
            Re: OTW's new R-10 Class WW1 sub kit

            Well Jeff it might be trapped air in the bow I'm not that sure. We were on a schedule yesterday and I only had an hour there to play.

            She dives stern first. Once under she's fine but it was quite shallow at this end of the lake. Until I have tested her more it's the safest place to be.

            Here's some video which will show you what I mean. She need bigger rudders for sure and I plan to make slip on so they can be removed for display. She had plenty of head speed bu needs to sit lower in the water to keep the prop from cavitation.

            That just requires a bit more water in the tank to lower the free board for runs and back up full at the dock.

            Steve


            www.steveneillsgarage.com

            Comment

            • JWLaRue
              Managing Editor, SubCommittee Report
              • Aug 1994
              • 4281

              #156
              Re: OTW's new R-10 Class WW1 sub kit

              Diving stern first can be due to the ballast tank being situated too far aft. But it can also be the result of hydrodynamic flow around the bow causing lift. My Seehund does this quite noticeably. I counter this by applying down force on the stern planes. I should note that the Seehund dives perfectly level when not moving.

              Watching the video, it wasn't clear if the boat would hold a level trim when not moving and just part of the conning tower out of the water? (and the air vented from the bow of course!)

              It does look like at least part of the trim issue will be solved by adding more ballast up front.

              -Jeff
              Rohr 1.....Los!

              Comment

              • steveneill
                SubCommittee Member
                • Jul 2009
                • 716

                #157
                Re: OTW's new R-10 Class WW1 sub kit

                All good and accurate observations Jeff. Bob was a bit concerned that the tank was too far forward of the CG of the boat. It is at optimum with the space and shape of the hull the Cylinder can not be moved any further back or forward.

                Looking at the video again and again I do believe it is trapped air I need to better vent. It holds pretty darn level under water but I kept hitting the shallow bottom.

                And to be completely honest I just didn't think about applying any down at all in the dive. Just didn't occur to me but next time. I may have to increase the throws on the dive planes as it is I had them set pretty low.

                First time runs are always a learning experience. One more ought to get the bugs out.

                steve
                www.steveneillsgarage.com

                Comment

                • JWLaRue
                  Managing Editor, SubCommittee Report
                  • Aug 1994
                  • 4281

                  #158
                  Re: OTW's new R-10 Class WW1 sub kit

                  As someone once said, "r/c subs are always a work in progress."

                  It should also be said that for a first-time-in-the-water, she ran really well. (rudder authority not withstanding)

                  Excellent work!

                  -Jeff
                  Rohr 1.....Los!

                  Comment

                  • steveneill
                    SubCommittee Member
                    • Jul 2009
                    • 716

                    #159
                    Re: OTW's new R-10 Class WW1 sub kit

                    Well tanks Jeff. I don't like jeeps.

                    Steve
                    www.steveneillsgarage.com

                    Comment

                    • Guest

                      #160
                      Re: OTW's new R-10 Class WW1 sub kit

                      I knew those rudders wouldn't be enough. Double the area, then it will turn.

                      Surprised you're getting trapped air on this boat, you have a lot of large holes drilled at bow, so the air should get out easily.
                      Running a countersink bit underneath the holes would help ventilation if you haven't done that already.

                      Comment

                      • steveneill
                        SubCommittee Member
                        • Jul 2009
                        • 716

                        #161
                        Re: OTW's new R-10 Class WW1 sub kit

                        No Andy I haven't but that's not a bad idea. Will do.

                        Thanks,

                        Steve
                        www.steveneillsgarage.com

                        Comment

                        • Guest

                          #162
                          Re: OTW's new R-10 Class WW1 sub kit

                          Had a look at some of the earlier stills. There is what looks like a valve, or some kind of access point near the tip of the bow that I've circled in red. Can this be opened up? If so that should eliminate any trapped wind problems (I'd still countersink the underside of the other holes).

                          Comment

                          • steveneill
                            SubCommittee Member
                            • Jul 2009
                            • 716

                            #163
                            Re: OTW's new R-10 Class WW1 sub kit

                            Andy thanks a bunch i'll take a look at that.

                            steve
                            www.steveneillsgarage.com

                            Comment

                            • steveneill
                              SubCommittee Member
                              • Jul 2009
                              • 716

                              #164
                              Re: OTW's new R-10 Class WW1 sub kit

                              I made this for Bob. Thought I'd share it her. His wife Liz informed me today Bob will be in hospital for a week or so. Not sure what for but send him and email and tell him we wish him well and a speedy recovery!

                              www.steveneillsgarage.com

                              Comment

                              • jefftytoo
                                SubCommittee Member
                                • Mar 2003
                                • 942

                                #165
                                Re: OTW's new R-10 Class WW1 sub kit

                                Done. Many thanks for the head's up, Steve!

                                JeffP

                                Comment

                                Working...