Hey, Dave, I like the
Hey, Dave, I like the idea of having a sub that works. If the scale guys want an exact scale waterline, they can put the bladder under the WTC and have the waterline at the bottom of the hull. Only problem is that the hull would then be upside down!!
Seriously, though, different hulls have different requirements, and the RCABS is a very adaptable system. In a sub with saddle tanks, you could put modified inner tubes in the saddle tanks and adjust trim with foam and lead to get the desired waterline. In a nuke, if the bladder is above the WTC, you just need to allow sufficient room for the bladder to expand, and have a sturdy system to hold the upper hull down, so you don't lift the top half of the hull away from the bottom half.
Have fun experimenting and improving the design and function of your model.
Hey, Dave, I like the idea of having a sub that works. If the scale guys want an exact scale waterline, they can put the bladder under the WTC and have the waterline at the bottom of the hull. Only problem is that the hull would then be upside down!!
Seriously, though, different hulls have different requirements, and the RCABS is a very adaptable system. In a sub with saddle tanks, you could put modified inner tubes in the saddle tanks and adjust trim with foam and lead to get the desired waterline. In a nuke, if the bladder is above the WTC, you just need to allow sufficient room for the bladder to expand, and have a sturdy system to hold the upper hull down, so you don't lift the top half of the hull away from the bottom half.
Have fun experimenting and improving the design and function of your model.



Comment