Good morning, everyone!
First off, I want it understood that this post is not meant as an attack on SC leadership in the slightest, but as a genuine inquiry from someone concerned over the health of the RC submarine hobby and what our role in it is.
My renewed interest in the value of the SubCommittee to the hobby came when I was nominated for President during the last elections. It got my entrepreneurial brain going in terms of what the organization could do better at, more of, or differently. In my mind, there were a great many possibilities. To my regret, I was not elected and to be honest, my fervor dwindled in favor of keeping my little hobby business afloat and customers happy (aka the "day to day grind"). That said, I was very interested in how the organization would evolve under the direction of new leaders.
As we sit here now over year into the new management of the SubCommittee, I would like to know, in fairly specific terms, what the SubCommittee has done better at, more of or differently than last year. At that rate, I would be actually be quite interested in knowing over the last five years what the SubCommittee has done better at, more of or differently.
I can say that from my perspective, there is ample desire and drive from people to get into this hobby. There are, as we've gone over previously in many threads here, many obstacles that are stopping them from diving in. We are in a good position to help address these issues by leveraging the collective expertise, knowledge and contacts of the organization. I do not feel that we are currently doing a good job of this.
In my mind, the SC is at a very important time right now. New technologies are changing the way that things are built and that businesses are run. People have drastically changing expectations about companies and products. People are interacting in different ways and working together differently. We need to build, grow, adapt, or die.
I'm the first to admit that I could have been more proactive in pushing ideas, hunting for support, campaigning for implementation, etc. I stand ready to assist as best I can, but the SC must be ready to change, and I would love to see some evidence that we're willing to do so.
I'm really interested in the membership's opinion, aligned or contrary to my own, and to SC leadership's reply. Thanks, everyone.
Bob Martin
Owner, the Nautilus Drydocks, LLC
First off, I want it understood that this post is not meant as an attack on SC leadership in the slightest, but as a genuine inquiry from someone concerned over the health of the RC submarine hobby and what our role in it is.
My renewed interest in the value of the SubCommittee to the hobby came when I was nominated for President during the last elections. It got my entrepreneurial brain going in terms of what the organization could do better at, more of, or differently. In my mind, there were a great many possibilities. To my regret, I was not elected and to be honest, my fervor dwindled in favor of keeping my little hobby business afloat and customers happy (aka the "day to day grind"). That said, I was very interested in how the organization would evolve under the direction of new leaders.
As we sit here now over year into the new management of the SubCommittee, I would like to know, in fairly specific terms, what the SubCommittee has done better at, more of or differently than last year. At that rate, I would be actually be quite interested in knowing over the last five years what the SubCommittee has done better at, more of or differently.
I can say that from my perspective, there is ample desire and drive from people to get into this hobby. There are, as we've gone over previously in many threads here, many obstacles that are stopping them from diving in. We are in a good position to help address these issues by leveraging the collective expertise, knowledge and contacts of the organization. I do not feel that we are currently doing a good job of this.
In my mind, the SC is at a very important time right now. New technologies are changing the way that things are built and that businesses are run. People have drastically changing expectations about companies and products. People are interacting in different ways and working together differently. We need to build, grow, adapt, or die.
I'm the first to admit that I could have been more proactive in pushing ideas, hunting for support, campaigning for implementation, etc. I stand ready to assist as best I can, but the SC must be ready to change, and I would love to see some evidence that we're willing to do so.
I'm really interested in the membership's opinion, aligned or contrary to my own, and to SC leadership's reply. Thanks, everyone.
Bob Martin
Owner, the Nautilus Drydocks, LLC
Comment