Attention all registered users. The new forum upgrade requires you to reset your password as you logon for the first time.
To reset your password choose this option that is displayed when you attempted to login with your username: "Forgotten your password? Click here!"
You will be sent an e-mail to the address that is associated with your forum account. Follow the simple directions to reset your password.
If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Well Sure, Why Throw Something Out if it Still Works??
Designed in the 1950s, the vessel was in production for the Soviet Union for only 48 months until being succeeded by nuclear-powered submarines 53 years ago.
Yes, the capabilities of the force are low, but their mere presence requires a slow down in operations until the threat is neutralized...and, they will probably get lucky and tag at least one ship grinding everything to a halt.
During the Falklands War the Brits were stopped by the threat from a pair of GUPPY boats. The article is rather uninformed with regards to the Romeo class and diesel boats in general, but what do you expect when it's a wire repub from The Telegraph. The Romeo class weren't replaced by nuclear boats, they were supplemented. Remember, the Russians operate a bunch of Kilos too with a new model in the works. A few of the DPRK's Romeos are actually pretty new. A 60+ year old design yes, but built (assembled) in the 80's. They've also got a few demilled Golf Class subs that seem to have disappeared.
Comment