special Navy Type IIA : januari 2008

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JWLaRue
    Managing Editor, SubCommittee Report
    • Aug 1994
    • 4281

    #61
    None here...but how about taking

    None here...but how about taking the Type XXIII discussion into it's own thread?

    -Jeff
    Rohr 1.....Los!

    Comment

    • hakkikt
      Junior Member
      • Jun 2006
      • 246

      #62
      Hijacking the thread back from

      Hijacking the thread back from the (interesting) Typ XXIII discussion:

      I am holding the SN Typ IIA kit in my hands now. I noticed that the forward hull pieces have rests of casting channels on the separation line, so that it is not possible to hold the hull halves together without bringing out a good knife or a small saw. There are also casting residues where the deck is supposed to meet the hull - again, no test fitting without cutting.

      Talking about the deck: opening the slots in the deck will be cumbersome but doable. The slots are a bit narrower than on the VIIC, so clean work will be more difficult. A metal deck would be worth its money, I hope Eduard will come to the rescue here.

      The line where the hull is vertically joined seems like a natural point of separation for RC application, to insert a WTC. The deck is not separated at that line and fine details are in the way of cutting it there, but there are ways around that.

      Comment

      • JWLaRue
        Managing Editor, SubCommittee Report
        • Aug 1994
        • 4281

        #63
        I can safely say that

        I can safely say that a PE deck for this kit will be forthcoming. (No, it's not me)

        Where the hull is split fore and aft is at an interesting location. I think this will allow SN to use the same four hull sections and then add an insert for them to make a IIB or IIC. A IID could be done the same way with the addition of add-on saddle tanks.

        -Jeff
        Rohr 1.....Los!

        Comment

        • rabapla
          Junior Member
          • Mar 2008
          • 4

          #64
          hi,

          maybe you'll find some

          hi,

          maybe you'll find some usefull informations in this thread:

          Comment

          • raalst
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2003
            • 1229

            #65
            Thanks Rabapla !

            Thanks Rabapla !

            Comment

            • JWLaRue
              Managing Editor, SubCommittee Report
              • Aug 1994
              • 4281

              #66
              Rabapla,

              Many thanks for the link.

              Rabapla,

              Many thanks for the link. It's good to see that others have similar observations about this kit.

              -Jeff
              Rohr 1.....Los!

              Comment

              • warpatroller
                Junior Member
                • Feb 2006
                • 308

                #67
                Danke Rabapla! After seeing all

                Danke Rabapla! After seeing all the problems and inaccuracies with the kit, I have decided not to buy it. Will just have to scratch build my own I suppose...

                Comment

                • hakkikt
                  Junior Member
                  • Jun 2006
                  • 246

                  #68
                  Does not look at all

                  Does not look at all to me like scratchbuilding is the only way out. They say it in rabapla's link too: nothing that cannot be fixed by boring a few holes and filling a few slots, maybe adding a few things like diesel exhausts or jumper wire blogs. Nothing that we aren't used to doing with kits of that scale anyway.
                  I am happy that I have it, and I look forward to some accurising, as usual. Hey, if we could not add a few things ourselves it would be boring

                  Comment

                  • warpatroller
                    Junior Member
                    • Feb 2006
                    • 308

                    #69
                    That was a joke guys!

                    That was a joke guys!

                    As far as I am concerned, the inaccuracies in that German thread are trivial. As long as the basic shape of the boat and tower are correct, I have no problem with the model. Filling and drilling a few holes and slots is easier than relocating the anchor well on the Revell VIIC (which I will not be doing on mine).

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X