Ohio class - boomer avalibility

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • anonymous

    #16
    Jeff jones,
    Thanks for the plug

    Jeff jones,
    Thanks for the plug and comments on my Seawolf and Virginia model kits.

    Comment

    • wayne frey
      Junior Member
      • Aug 2003
      • 925

      #17
      Pete,
      Your email bounced back..

      Pete,
      Your email bounced back..

      Comment

      • anonymous

        #18
        John Shagane from Subron6 keeps

        John Shagane from Subron6 keeps jabbin' me about building a 1/96 Ohio. Said he'd buy one site unseen. Maybe that'll be my next project. I agree, I think 1/96 scale is da bomb. Big enough to fit a lot of detail, but small enough to lug to the pond (and out).

        The big job will be to decypher all the detail differences between the various boats made along the way. I'm a stickler for detail, so whatever I build I want to be as right as can be. I think this part would drive me crazy.

        Pete

        Comment

        • wayne frey
          Junior Member
          • Aug 2003
          • 925

          #19
          tried again. bounced back again.

          tried again. bounced back again.

          Comment

          • silent runner
            SubCommittee Member
            • Jun 2005
            • 188

            #20
            Pete and I have been

            Pete and I have been emailing back and forth with no trouble.

            I ordered a Virginia class kit and will say that Pete's excellent level of workmanship is exceeded only by the level of professionalism in which he is handling my order. I am also 'nudging' him to do an Ohio class.

            Mike

            Comment

            • desert boat
              Junior Member
              • Feb 2003
              • 195

              #21
              Pete ... how about posting

              Pete ... how about posting some photos of your two products.
              Would like to see what your Virginia and Seawolf look like.

              Comment

              • silent runner
                SubCommittee Member
                • Jun 2005
                • 188

                #22
                The pictures of Pete's 2

                The pictures of Pete's 2 beautiful boats are on his homepage here, as well as his listed website.

                Comment

                • sam reichart
                  Past President
                  • Feb 2003
                  • 1325

                  #23
                  The pictures of Pete's 2

                  The pictures of Pete's 2 beautiful boats are on his homepage here, as well as his listed website.
                  http://www.subcommittee.com/SubComm/member_homepages_search.cfm?MemberID=142

                  Comment

                  • boss subfixer
                    Junior Member
                    • Aug 2004
                    • 656

                    #24
                    I've been following this thread

                    I've been following this thread and I've got a question, some of you are saying something about the differences throughout the class as it was being built. I am one of the thousands of people that have built this class (I started with the 729) and for the life of me I can't figure out what your talking about. Externally the Tridents were virtually identical. That is until the SSGN conversion. One comment was made about 1/96 being a good scale, being easy to transport, at 1/96 the Trident will have a LOA of about 6 feet, not a bad thing just keep this in mind. I have some pictures of a static wooden model on my members home page I'm repairing for a friend that I will be pulling masters from in 1/96 scale, stop by and check it out. With any luck and with the help Matt Thor I will be putting out a kit. No expected arrival date yet. This is my first attempt at this so bear with me.

                    Comment

                    • tom dougherty
                      Senior Member
                      • Jul 2005
                      • 1361

                      #25
                      A few minor changes were

                      A few minor changes were made in the class as constrcution proceeded. For example, the last few models had their countermeasure dispenser tubes moved back on the turtleback to a position aft of the missile tubes. Take a careful look at these photos of the Wyoming, SSBN 742)]http://www.navsource.org/archives/08/0874203.jpg[/url]
                      http://www.navsource.org/archives/08/0874204.jpg

                      Comment

                      • anonymous

                        #26
                        Great shots, Thanks. Have you

                        Great shots, Thanks. Have you noticed the number of countermeasure discharge locations have more than doubled from say 20 years ago? On all classes.

                        Steve R

                        Comment

                        • thordesign
                          Junior Member
                          • Feb 2003
                          • 343

                          #27
                          Guys,

                          I am working with Don

                          Guys,

                          I am working with Don Evans to develope plans to produce an extremely accurate OHIO Class SSBN. Please bear with me as I am buried in work and do not move very fast on anything anymore.

                          I have also had several requests to produce the 1/96 Virginia from the patterns completed 2 years ago. At this point, I really am hesistant to do it. The model performs very poorly, even in comparison to my SSN21 model. I know my source information is extremely accurate, and even followup interviews with current crew members of VIRGINIA show that the model does behave very much like the full size boat. It seems she has been a dissappointment on several fronts. I believe that the control surfaces must be increased in size by at least 20 % and the chord by at least 15% as we ended up doing on our latest SSN21 release. This may cure the problems, but until I get time to seatrial any changes, I do not want to release a poor performing model.

                          Matt

                          Comment

                          • anonymous

                            #28
                            Matt,

                            Glad to see you have

                            Matt,

                            Glad to see you have surfaced again!

                            Steve

                            Comment

                            • thordesign
                              Junior Member
                              • Feb 2003
                              • 343

                              #29
                              Hey Steve,

                              I am so busier

                              Hey Steve,

                              I am so busier than I have ever been before. We have projects litterally coming out of our ears right now. No time to play.

                              Comment

                              • thordesign
                                Junior Member
                                • Feb 2003
                                • 343

                                #30
                                Hey Steve,

                                I am busier than

                                Hey Steve,

                                I am busier than I have ever been before. We have projects litterally coming out of our ears right now. No time to play.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X