Whales may bump Navy sonar training field out of Fla. site

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • u-5075
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2003
    • 1134

    #1

    Whales may bump Navy sonar training field out of Fla. site

    http://hamptonroads.com/2008/09/whales- ... t-fla-site

    Whales may bump Navy sonar training field out of Fla. site

    To learn more
    For more information, or to comment on the proposal at Undersea Warfare Training Range Web site.

    By Kate Wiltrout
    The Virginian-Pilot
    © September 28, 2008
    NORFOLK

    The Navy has decided that a controversial sonar training range it proposed building off North Carolina's coast would be better located off Florida, where its East Coast sub-hunting helicopters are based.

    More than 40,000 pages of public comments - most of them critical - had flooded in after the Navy announced coastal North Carolina as its preferred site for the range in 2005. It also considered locating the range off Virginia, South Carolina or Florida.

    The switch in preference to a site off Jacksonville, Fla., may prove to be just as troublesome for the Navy. The border of the proposed 625-square-mile range would come within a few dozen miles of calving grounds of the endangered North Atlantic right whale.

    Experts believe fewer than 400 right whales remain in the North Atlantic. The population spends its summers off the coast of Maine and Nova Scotia, and in winter, pregnant females migrate to warmer southern waters off Georgia and Florida to give birth.

    Michelle Nowlin, a professor of environmental law at Duke University, said the Navy appears to be on a direct collision course with state and federal efforts to protect the right whale.

    Navy brass have long called for an instrumented range to teach sailors how to detect quiet diesel submarines in noisy coastal waters. Hundreds of underwater microphones placed on the ocean floor would record exercises, so crews could reconstruct events.

    The Navy estimates that the range, which would cost an estimated $100 million, would be used 480 times a year, from one to six hours at a time.

    Many scenarios would involve surface ships and submarines from Norfolk and Groton, Conn., but the most frequent user of the range would be SH-60 Seahawk helicopters. As a result of 2005 base realignments, all of the Navy's East Coast Seahawk squadrons are now based in Florida. P-3C Orion planes, which conduct long-range anti-submarine warfare patrols, also will be based in Jacksonville.

    At close range, blasts of mid-frequency, active sonar - the type Navy ships and helicopters use to detect enemy submarines - can injure dolphins and whales, which use sound to navigate and communicate. Scientists understand less about how marine mammals are affected by repeated or continual exposure to underwater noise.

    Jene Nissen, environmental acoustics manager for the Navy's Fleet Forces Command, said the critical habitat for right whales extends to about 20 miles off the coast of northern Florida. The range's westernmost boundary would be 50 miles offshore.

    "We believe we're far enough off that we're not going to have an adverse effect on right whales," Nissen said. Navy analysts concluded that humpback and right whales might behave differently when exposed to sonar from the range. But Nissen said the effects would be low-level, and not permanent.

    Michael Jasny, a senior policy analyst for the Natural Resources Defense Council, isn't convinced.

    Jasny said the 1,000 pages of analysis the Navy compiled to support its decision "makes no attempt to consider cumulative effects on marine mammals, beyond glib statements that they wouldn't occur."

    He also criticized the Navy's proposed mitigation efforts. The service should consider staying off the range in certain seasons or conditions, he said. Other measures that could reduce impact] inappropriate."

    Michelle Duval, an invertebrate biologist with the North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries in Morehead City, said she doesn't think North Carolina is out of consideration yet.

    "I wouldn't say that the change in location means that North Carolina agencies can sit back and breathe a sigh of relief, or not pay attention to this," Duval said. "Some new information may come to light which could cause another change in location."
  • u-5075
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2003
    • 1134

    #2
    http://www.pnj.com/apps/pbcs.dll/articl ... 006/NEWS01

    Navy prefers sonar

    http://www.pnj.com/apps/pbcs.dll/articl ... 006/NEWS01

    Navy prefers sonar site off Fla. as hearings start
    AP • September 29, 2008

    NOFOLK, Va. (AP) _ The Navy says its preferred location for a proposed sonar range to train submarine hunters is in Florida waters instead of off Virginia or the Carolinas.
    The Navy says the 625-square-mile site off Jacksonville, Fla., is outside an area of the Atlantic frequented by endangered right whales, The Virginian-Pilot of Norfolk reported today. But environmental groups contend the sonar still can harm the whales, which use sounds to communicate and are sensitive to sonar.

    Hearings on the plan are scheduled to start this week. The first hearing is today at Chincoteague, near the Virginia proposed site.

    A North Carolina hearing is scheduled Wednesday at Morehead City, N.C., and two more hearings are scheduled early next week in South Carolina and Florida.

    More than 40,000 pages of comment from the public already have been filed with the Navy on its plan and much of the comment is critical.

    Duke University environmental law professor Michelle Nowlin said the Navy could be in conflict with state and federal government work to protect the whales.

    The newspaper said experts think less than 400 right whales still live in the north Atlantic. Pregnant females migrate in winter to warm waters off Florida and Georgia to have their calves.

    A Navy official said the habitat for the whales extends about 20 miles off the north Florida coast while the closest boundary for the sonar range is 50 miles offshore.

    "We believe we're far enough off that we're not going to have an adverse effect on right whales," said Jene Nissen, environmental acoustics manager for the Navy's Fleet Forces Command.

    Nissen said any effects from sonar pulses on whales would be low level and not permanent.

    The Navy has said it needs the range, which is an array of underwater microphones to detect sonar, so sailors can train on detecting quiet diesel subs in noisy nearshore waters.

    Navy officials said the range would cost about $100 million and be used for periods up to six hours about 480 times a year.

    One favorable point for the Navy's plan is that its fleet of sub-detecting planes and helicopters are being based in Jacksonville.

    Spokeswoman Marguerite Jordan of Florida's Department of Environmental Protection said her agency is reviewing the Navy's analysis. The state's Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission already has told the Navy it shouldn't consider locating the range offshore or not use it between mid-October and mid-April when the whales are giving birth to their young.

    North Carolina officials aren't sure the state is out of consideration. It is the third alternative, behind the waters off Charleston, S.C.

    Navy sonar site]http://projects.earthtech.com/uswtr/[/url]

    Comment

    Working...
    X