Probe urged to target Hunley finances - McConnell rival raises questions

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • tmsmalley
    SubCommittee Member
    • Feb 2003
    • 2376

    #1

    Probe urged to target Hunley finances - McConnell rival raises questions

    Group calls for probe into Hunley project's finances

    The government watchdog group Common Cause is asking Attorney General Henry McMaster to look into the finances of the H.L. Hunley project.

    "There's something fishy about it," executive director John Crangle said.

    Questions have been raised about spending, many by Charleston attorney Justin Kahn, the Democrat opposing state Sen. Glenn McConnell, R-Charleston, in next month's election.

    McConnell chairs the South Carolina Hunley Commission overseeing the preservation of the Hunley, the Confederate submarine that was the first sub in history to sink an enemy warship.

    Common Cause wants to know if Friends of the Hunley, a group supporting the effort, is subject to the Freedom of Information Act. It also is asking whether income from the
    project should go to the state general fund instead of the Hunley project.

    Friends of the Hunley provided documents requested by The (Columbia) State. The documents show the group paid more than $277,000 to Richard Quinn and Associates of Columbia to market the Hunley. Quinn also does work for McConnell's re-election campaign.

    McConnell said the marketing justified its costs. Quinn said more than 200,000 people have toured the North Charleston lab where the sub is being preserved.

    Documents and campaign records show Friends of the Hunley paid former board member Mark Ragan $70,000 to research and write a Hunley book but did not put the work up for bid.

    Raegan Quinn with Richard Quinn and Associates said Thursday the book was not put up for bid because author Clive Cussler gave $40,000 to Friends of the Hunley specifically for Ragan to write it.

    "It was a very comprehensive analysis. Believe me, I did a lot more than $40,000 worth of work," Ragan said of the research. The book has been finished but not published. McConnell said Ragan was qualified because he already had written about the sub.

    Records also show Burroughs & Chapin Co. and two of its executives have given $2,250 to McConnell's campaign. The company recently opened an interactive Hunley exhibit at Broadway at the Beach, which guarantees a donation each year for the Hunley project.

    The contributions were unrelated and were "given in support of candidates who are good for South Carolina," company spokesman Pat Dowling said.

    McConnell said the deal is good for the Hunley and taxpayers.

    "They could have built it without paying us one nickel or dime."


    SAME STORY FROM THE AP ===
    The Associated Press


    CHARLESTON - The government watchdog group Common Cause is asking S.C. Attorney General Henry McMaster to look into the finances of the H.L. Hunley project.

    "There's something fishy about it," executive director John Crangle said.

    Questions have been raised about spending, many by Charleston lawyer Justin Kahn, the Democrat opposing state Sen. Glenn McConnell, R-Charleston, in next month's election.

    McConnell is chairman of the S.C. Hunley Commission overseeing the preservation of the Confederate submarine.

    Common Cause wants to know if Friends of the Hunley, a group supporting the effort, is subject to the Freedom of Information Act. It also is asking whether income from the project should go to the state general fund.

    Although not required to do so, Friends of the Hunley provided
    documents requested by The (Columbia) State.

    The documents show the group paid more than $277,000 to Richard Quinn and Associates of Columbia to market of the Hunley. Quinn also does work for McConnell's re-election campaign.

    McConnell said the marketing justified its costs.

    ###
  • tmsmalley
    SubCommittee Member
    • Feb 2003
    • 2376

    #2
    Let's not sink the `Hunley'

    Let's not sink the `Hunley' again

    By ED MCMULLEN

    Guest columnist From "The State".


    Only a couple of years after its historic raising — which brought
    positive international attention to our state — the world's
    first
    successful combat submarine is under attack again. The Hunley
    project has been assailed by a Lowcountry political candidate who is
    using misinformation to score points against his opponent.
    Unfortunately, those allegations have also been reported by the
    media.

    The scrutiny of the Hunley project is not really about mismanagement
    or lack of success. The opposite is true. It is a well-managed
    project that has brought millions of dollars into our economy,
    revitalized a naval base, won national awards and developed new
    technology. Currently, it is also almost entirely supported by
    private donations — with the exception of security service, the
    Hunley project has not received any state money since 2001. Even
    federal dollars make up only around 25 percent of this year's
    budget.

    The negative focus on the Hunley project is a political swipe at
    Sen. Glenn McConnell of Charleston, who serves as chairman of the
    Hunley Commission. The commission was authorized by state law to
    oversee the recovery and conservation of the Hunley in 1996 "to
    ensure that the submarine... remain in South Carolina in perpetuity
    and (that it be) displayed in an appropriate manner for the benefit
    of future generations."

    Under this broad authority the commission formed a nonprofit
    foundation called Friends of the Hunley to help achieve its mission.
    That decision reflects a positive trend in government toward public-
    private partnerships, and it has proven very successful for the
    Hunley.

    Sen. McConnell, a strong supporter of government accountability and
    fiscal responsibility, should be thanked for his ardent support of
    the submarine. It would cost our state a fortune to buy the kind of
    positive exposure that the Hunley has generated in news reports,
    magazines and even television specials.

    Because of that widespread attention, almost a quarter of a million
    people from all 50 states and 20 countries have visited our state to
    see the submarine.

    The Hunley is a public-private partnership that works — exactly
    the
    kind of measure that taxpayers want more of. Many public agencies in
    South Carolina, including universities and a variety of service
    programs, have formed private foundations to help raise private
    dollars to supplement public funding. That arrangement takes
    pressure off taxpayers to foot the whole bill, and still allows
    worthy projects and institutions to be viable.

    Contrary to hints in news reports, there is no lack of
    accountability on the Hunley. Public funds appropriated to the
    project are based on detailed budgets approved by federal or state
    authorities. The Hunley project's financial records are also
    examined regularly by an independent auditing firm. Those audits are
    filed with the S.C. secretary of state's office and available for
    inspection.

    There is nothing improper or imprudent about putting private money
    raised for the Hunley back into the exhibit rather than sending it
    to Columbia. It makes no sense to put dollars raised by a charity
    for the Hunley's preservation and study into the general fund,
    where
    they could be used for other purposes.

    The State's editorial suggests that Parks, Recreation and Tourism
    should manage the Hunley. But in fact, revenues collected at our
    state's parks are not deposited in the general fund. Rather, they
    are retained by PRT to support our parks. Funds raised by the
    Friends of the Hunley should not be treated any differently.

    A headline in The State said "Hunley money, like the Hunley
    itself,
    belongs to the state." Actually, the Hunley remains the property
    of
    the federal government on permanent loan to the state. Sen.
    McConnell was wise to add a provision to the agreement specifying
    that funds raised to support the Hunley must remain in South
    Carolina. Otherwise the federal government could attempt to lay
    claim to Hunley revenues.

    Taxpayers should be grateful to Sen. McConnell, the Hunley
    Commission, Friends of the Hunley and the hundreds of volunteers who
    have worked to make the Hunley a success while minimizing the burden
    on taxpayers. We should encourage more private assistance projects
    that benefit taxpayers instead of discouraging volunteers and
    contributors who want to support a worthwhile project.

    Now that we've finally saved the Hunley, let's not sink it
    again.

    Mr. McMullen is president of the South Carolina Policy Council.

    Comment

    Working...
    X