Engel kits

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Guest

    #31
    Love a Cap with great

    Love a Cap with great humor and its always fun!

    I thought he made his own operating masts ect,I do to save money for other fun stuff like vacations and its funner to make it work for pennies on the dallar.

    Turf wars are always fun but I did not start it , I just explained a different way to do the same thing cheaper.

    Always inovating and reaserching this fun hobby is a great challange and that spirit is in us all.

    Dave

    Comment

    • JWLaRue
      Managing Editor, SubCommittee Report
      • Aug 1994
      • 4281

      #32
      Yea, I don't get it

      Yea, I don't get it either.

      The original poster asked about Engel r/c sub kits....and all of a sudden we get off subject postings from some sort of a vendor pushing compressed and non-compressed (alternative) ballast systems...along with a number of inaccurate statements.

      All the poster wanted was information on Engel kits and their ballast systems. Can't folks, especially vendors, either stay on subject or refrain from posting?

      -Jeff
      Rohr 1.....Los!

      Comment

      • Guest

        #33
        Must we get personal is

        Must we get personal is that important ,I dont think so ,its just a dicusstion right.

        But hay who started it.
        I have better things to do.

        Just a freindly builder Dave

        Comment

        • JWLaRue
          Managing Editor, SubCommittee Report
          • Aug 1994
          • 4281

          #34
          I don't know, Dave. You

          I don't know, Dave. You sure do sound like the pot calling the kettle black.

          This has nothing to do with "anger management" (at least on my part ), but does have to do with jumping on someone's thread and taking it off topic.

          My recent post was not personal. However, it *was* an expression of frustration at the tendency of some folks to drag posts off topic...especially when pushing their own products. It's not polite and it's not professional.

          -Jeff
          Rohr 1.....Los!

          Comment

          • pirate
            Member
            • Oct 2005
            • 849

            #35
            I think the Engel piston

            I think the Engel piston system is the best in the world, even though I've never operated one.

            There you go. A glowing endorsement for the original poster. I've heard NOTHING but good things about Engel products. If you have the money to buy a premium product, then you go and get it. I'm not going to discourage that. When you make a premium product, you can charge a premium price for it. Those Germans make good stuff. I have an Audi automobile, and it's the best car I've ever seen, driven or felt. Yes, if something goes wrong it costs a lot to fix, but that's the price of leading edge technology. The Germans don't scrimp.

            Comment

            • Guest

              #36
              Jeff, which aftermarket electronic module

              Jeff, which aftermarket electronic module is that?
              I'm using the module from Nils Brakmann, but I understand that he is now referring folks to (I think) Christian Feldmann. [/url]http://mitglied.lycos.de/cf1266/[/url]

              Andy (Sub Culture) tells me that these are basically the same as the ones from Nils.

              -Jeff
              Just to clarify this. The board I have is made by Markus Rieger. Nils did (does?) a board, which worked on a similar system , but the only one I ever saw used relays to switch the motor, whereas Markus' board uses a solid state H-bridge, which is more compact and more reliable IMO.



              Christian does a very small board, based on a magnetic encoder like Markus and Nils board. It's got a much lower current rating of 5A (Versus 30A for Markus' board). However if you're using 12 volts to power your tanks, that still allows 60 watts of poke. So unless you're building a very big and inefficient piston tank, Christians board should work just fine.



              Either board will serve you well, the quality of Markus' board is really high with professionally made solder resist PCB's, SMD etc. Christian's look a little more home grown, but reportedly work very well, and it's tiny dimensions will suit a baby sub very well.

              Comment

              • JWLaRue
                Managing Editor, SubCommittee Report
                • Aug 1994
                • 4281

                #37
                Andy,

                Ahh! The correction is very

                Andy,

                Ahh! The correction is very much appreciated! You had given me those names a while back and I clearly got the two of them mixed up.

                Question: is there a control board (other than Engel's) that can handle two pistons with individual control or do we still need two?

                -tnx!

                Jeff
                Rohr 1.....Los!

                Comment

                • Guest

                  #38
                  Dear Jeff

                  If you dont think

                  Dear Jeff

                  If you dont think that your stament is not offensive or at the least unprofestional than I fell sorry for you.

                  I did not in any way show a picture or promote a product that this so called vendor pushes,you make people feel like drug puchers that is offensive and I expected more from a person of you stature.
                  I am sorry to see this on the SCR.

                  If anyone is promoting a product its you with the above module ,looks good.

                  Why would you mock a ballast system that is as real in its operation as the full size subs use?
                  It has been proven to work and was aproved by the Coast Gard.

                  More than likely it is because you did not make it and I can understand that feeling as others have had the same thing.

                  Same goes for the other system.

                  If anyone went off topic it was you asking me about my system ,I just mearly answered your request and all I get is BULL and even insults,but hay its all fun any way and I am well used to it.

                  Via Con Dios Amigo Creido!

                  Jeff Wrote:
                  Yea, I don't get it either.

                  The original poster asked about Engel r/c sub kits....and all of a sudden we get off subject postings from some sort of a vendor pushing compressed and non-compressed (alternative) ballast systems...along with a number of inaccurate statements.

                  All the poster wanted was information on Engel kits and their ballast systems. Can't folks, especially vendors, either stay on subject or refrain from posting?

                  -Jeff

                  Comment

                  • Guest

                    #39
                    No you have to buy

                    No you have to buy two boards.

                    I've seen some boats that use a single tank, with two pistons and connecting drive shaft between each end of the tank. The pistons move in and out simultaneously, circumventing the problem of a shifting c.o.g.

                    With that kind of system, one board is all you need.

                    You can then actively trim a boat by attaching the main battery pack to a servo. Norbert discusses this in his book.

                    Markus sent me details of a board for the Futaba FC-16 set. This enables, with the help of mixing facilities, the trimming of two tanks with his boards in a simple and logical manner. You have two pots attached to the transmitter. One deals with ballast volume, the other with the bias of the ballast between the two tank- the latter enables proportional, longitudinal trim. You adjust these until your boat sits very close to perfect neutral buoyancy and level trim.

                    Two toggle switches enable the operator to then select dive, neutral buoyancy, surface, biased or unbiased submerged trim .

                    If that sounds a bit confusing, then I agree it is a bit. However once I built it, and tried it out on the bench, the operation became clear. With that board, and two controllers with piston tanks, ballast can be adjusted accurately to within a gram or two.

                    Comment

                    • JWLaRue
                      Managing Editor, SubCommittee Report
                      • Aug 1994
                      • 4281

                      #40
                      Not at all confusing......the concept

                      Not at all confusing......the concept of being able to adjust the differential between the two tanks makes perfect sense!

                      Would I be correct to assume that a Futaba FC-16 is not a requirement for this capability?

                      ....I think it may be time to start planning the ballast system for a large fleetboat using Markus' electronics.

                      -Jeff
                      Rohr 1.....Los!

                      Comment

                      • Guest

                        #41
                        You would need some mixing

                        You would need some mixing facility on the set- It uses the two programmable mixers on the FC16.

                        A basic knowledge of the pots used on your TX would help too.

                        The board is totally passive, except for the addition of a small memory chip, which upgraded the FC16's model memory from 2 to 26 memories.

                        I made up two PCB boards, one went to Ramesh (Wheelerdealer). I left the memory chip off of his board, as he already uses Futaba's CAMPAC boards.

                        A PCB isn't really necessary, but makes it more compact. You could easily build up the circuit on a strip of variboard.

                        Comment

                        • Guest

                          #42
                          Man did this thread go

                          Man did this thread go off the original post,I bet the poster cant believe it niether.

                          Dave

                          Comment

                          • JWLaRue
                            Managing Editor, SubCommittee Report
                            • Aug 1994
                            • 4281

                            #43
                            Man did this thread go

                            Man did this thread go off the original post,I bet the poster cant believe it niether.

                            Dave
                            I've asked for an independent opinion about that.

                            Talking about control electronics as add-ons to Engel kits is not necessarily off topic....unlike some other subjects introduced into this thread.

                            -Jeff
                            Rohr 1.....Los!

                            Comment

                            • Guest

                              #44
                              Yes but its not made

                              Yes but its not made by Engel and thats what the thread is about right?.

                              Dave

                              Comment

                              • greenman407
                                Junior Member
                                • Sep 2007
                                • 1186

                                #45
                                Come on dudes , lets

                                Come on dudes , lets all play nice!

                                Comment

                                Working...