Attention all registered users. The new forum upgrade requires you to reset your password as you logon for the first time.
To reset your password choose this option that is displayed when you attempted to login with your username: "Forgotten your password? Click here!"
You will be sent an e-mail to the address that is associated with your forum account. Follow the simple directions to reset your password.
If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
My personal experience as a technician who works with just about every facet of engineering technology, is that electronic devices are more dependable than mechanical ones, providing they are designed well .
My experience as an electronic engineer has made me very leary of electronic fail-safe devices. I'm a believer in the KISS principle and applying just the right amount of technology to solve a problem. Too much complexity harbors unforseen failure modes that are sometimes not discovered until the system is needed. And I don't want to loose a boat due to excess complexity. I would be much more comfortable with a simple wind-up deadman timer. Mechanical Clocks have been around longer than electronics and are well understood.
Fair enough. I think you will have to build it yourself, or adapt another mechanism though. I can't see anyone wishing to go to the time and expense of developing such a gadget for what would be a very small market, and even if they did, the finished cost would probably put a lot of folk off.
Comment