Missile Construction Question

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ramius-ii
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2003
    • 393

    #1

    Missile Construction Question

    Hi All!
    I have been trying to follow the June 1995 Issue 21 article by Mathew Spade on constructing missiles. In the article he writes "Next, drill a 1/6th inch hole in the bottom of the missile and slightly counter bore the hole." If my calculations are correct, 1/6th inch hole is .166 decimal or a #19 drill. This seems very large to me. Has anyone actually built a missile or missiles following this article and is this a correct and valid size hole or did I do something wrong?

    Thanks, Ed
  • wlambing
    SubCommittee Member
    • Feb 2003
    • 848

    #2
    Ed,

    1/16th inch is 0.062.

    B^)

    Ed,

    1/16th inch is 0.062.

    B^)

    Comment

    • ramius-ii
      Junior Member
      • Apr 2003
      • 393

      #3
      Thanks and the article says

      Thanks and the article says one-sixth of an inch which seems very large.

      Comment

      • wlambing
        SubCommittee Member
        • Feb 2003
        • 848

        #4
        Ed,

        I just reread the

        Ed,

        I just reread the article. I think we have a recurring typo for that fraction! Some thought food; There's butt-tons of 1/16 stock in our little universe and I suspect only two lengths of 1/6, stored somewhere in the vaults of Lower Slobovia. I also supect those pieces are made of Nonobtainium. ;^)

        If the hole (nozzle) in the bottom of the missile is much bigger than 1/16 you'll not get too very much thrust from the gas expanding through same.

        Take care,

        Bill

        Comment

        • ramius-ii
          Junior Member
          • Apr 2003
          • 393

          #5
          Hi Bill! Thanks. Where I

          Hi Bill! Thanks. Where I get confused is when I look at the pictures in the article it looks just as you said, about 1/16th inches. I was given some Estes rocket motors (1/2A6-2) by my neighbor and the exhaust holes are about 1/6th of an inch! My intent is to incorporate the proper size o-ring in the tail of the missile as a seal against the "pin". Here is a drawing of the missile with a 1/6th hole. What do you think?

          Best, Ed

          Comment

          • mike dory
            SubCommittee Member
            • Feb 2004
            • 158

            #6
            Give Matt a call

            Guy's - You might just give Matt a call. He's always been willing to help others. The last phone number I have for him is (770) 929-1945. You won't find a better man. Best Wishes..... Mike Dory

            Comment

            • wlambing
              SubCommittee Member
              • Feb 2003
              • 848

              #7
              Ed,

              I thought you were

              Ed,

              I thought you were going with a gas ejection system. Matt and Dr. Art Broder have good experience with missiles. If you're going to use Estes motors, that's a whole different world. I remember years ago when Loren Perry burned the bow of his USS Long Beach (CGN-9) using the smallest Estes motors for A/A missiles. It was sad!!

              Good luck, I'm going back to sleep now!

              B^)

              Comment

              • Rogue Sub
                Junior Member
                • Jul 2006
                • 1724

                #8
                I seem to remember watching

                I seem to remember watching a video where Mike was talking about how his rocket motor missile went through some lady's house and ruined her carpet.... Dont quote me.

                Bill I am the one using a gas ejection system.

                Comment

                • ramius-ii
                  Junior Member
                  • Apr 2003
                  • 393

                  #9
                  Hi Guys! http://www.subcommittee.com/forum/icon_smile.gif
                  Thanks to

                  Hi Guys!
                  Thanks to all. Yes, I am using a gas system and I was only looking at a rocket motor to see what size Estes used. The plan is to incorporate an 0-ring seal in the base of the missiles.

                  Best, Ed

                  Comment

                  • wlambing
                    SubCommittee Member
                    • Feb 2003
                    • 848

                    #10
                    Kevin,
                    I know you're using

                    Kevin,
                    I know you're using gas. That's why I'll have my trusty and faithful MK V mask with the heavy duty cartridges installed!!!!


                    B^)

                    Comment

                    • ramius-ii
                      Junior Member
                      • Apr 2003
                      • 393

                      #11
                      Hi All!
                      First, thanks Mike I

                      Hi All!
                      First, thanks Mike I called Matt Spade, we had a great conversation and I learned a lot! He sends his greetings and best wishes to everyone. The answer is 3/32" or .09375. Matt started with 1/16" and found that 3/32" worked better. For all those developing missiles, one piece of valuable info is that a missile will work very different when launched from underwater than in plain air. "In plain air a missile will appear to be very disappointing, while launched from underwater will work amazingly!"

                      Best to All, Ed

                      Comment

                      • Rogue Sub
                        Junior Member
                        • Jul 2006
                        • 1724

                        #12
                        As you may or may

                        As you may or may not know I have been makin a missile system for my ohio. Here is a look at how it works so far. I have been launching the missiles using 60psi and liquid air for propellant in the missile. The cylinders are 4" long and about 3"- 2.5" nominal gas space inside. Overall Missile length with balsa nose cone is 5". The exhaust port is 1/16" with a taper bore nozzle and o-ring seal. For my testing I am using air from my compressor to launch, later I will use propel on board, which has a pressure of about 70psi at around 70 degrees F. Right now I am test launching out of a bucket and getting small heights. To increase my height I am going to reduce weight by cutting down on bulkhead thickness. this will not only increase my gas volume but also decrease weight. A 3/32 nozzle is also interesting. Now for some photos and a movie!
                        Sorry If I jacked your thread Ramius I will move it if you like
















                        [/youtube]

                        Comment

                        • Rogue Sub
                          Junior Member
                          • Jul 2006
                          • 1724

                          #13
                          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=guLXjlHFyCg

                          Comment

                          • anonymous

                            #14
                            Kevin with increased gas volume....

                            Kevin with increased gas volume.... great....

                            Comment

                            • Rogue Sub
                              Junior Member
                              • Jul 2006
                              • 1724

                              #15
                              Yeah believe it buddy as

                              Yeah believe it buddy as you type at this moment I am killing the dogs.

                              Comment

                              Working...