Hey all,
I'm putting a fore/aft trim tanks in my VIIc/41 for fine control of "zero bubble". I've been in discussion with Skip Asay on this arrangement. I like it for a number of reasons:
- Realistic trim control. (That's how the big boys do it).
- Small trim tank requirement (very little space).
- Totally independent system. Not connected to main ballast control.
- Water weight in trim tanks remains constant eliminating fluctuating buoyancy issues. Only variable is in shifting that weight fore or aft.
- Cheap.
- Not complicated.
- Light weight. (Trim tanks take on neutral buoyancy when 1/2 full of water, allowing for both a subtraction or addition to water in the tank. Tanks below waterline so no added main ballast volume required. Pump and plumbing is only added weight to sub, which is minimal.
It's my opinion that what is important in this system is to be able to control the flow of the water from fore/aft tanks. Very little water exchange from the tanks would be required to trim the sub since what is happening is weight is being subtracted from one, and added to the other, in effect doubling the effect of the volume of water being exchanged. I'm thinking that a pump that has a very small flow rate is the answer. (or a pump modified in such a way). The way I see it, the actual size of the trim tanks, as long as they are neutrally buoyant when 1/2 full, is of little consequence, and that it's the volume of water being exchanged that is of most importance. Of secondary importance is the location of the trim tanks in the sub, with tanks mounted at the further extremes having more leverage and thus being more sensitive in trimming the sub given a particular volume of water being exchanged from the fore/aft tanks. For eg. If the trim tanks were 500 mls, 50mls, or 5mls, ....if 1ml of water was being exchanged from the fore to the aft tank, it would have the same net result on the trim regardless of tank size, given these tanks had the same distance between them. Am I wrong in this thinking ?
I would be interested in knowing if anybody has this type of system in their sub and what their experiences with it are. Throwing this topic out there for discussion.
Mylo
I'm putting a fore/aft trim tanks in my VIIc/41 for fine control of "zero bubble". I've been in discussion with Skip Asay on this arrangement. I like it for a number of reasons:
- Realistic trim control. (That's how the big boys do it).
- Small trim tank requirement (very little space).
- Totally independent system. Not connected to main ballast control.
- Water weight in trim tanks remains constant eliminating fluctuating buoyancy issues. Only variable is in shifting that weight fore or aft.
- Cheap.
- Not complicated.
- Light weight. (Trim tanks take on neutral buoyancy when 1/2 full of water, allowing for both a subtraction or addition to water in the tank. Tanks below waterline so no added main ballast volume required. Pump and plumbing is only added weight to sub, which is minimal.
It's my opinion that what is important in this system is to be able to control the flow of the water from fore/aft tanks. Very little water exchange from the tanks would be required to trim the sub since what is happening is weight is being subtracted from one, and added to the other, in effect doubling the effect of the volume of water being exchanged. I'm thinking that a pump that has a very small flow rate is the answer. (or a pump modified in such a way). The way I see it, the actual size of the trim tanks, as long as they are neutrally buoyant when 1/2 full, is of little consequence, and that it's the volume of water being exchanged that is of most importance. Of secondary importance is the location of the trim tanks in the sub, with tanks mounted at the further extremes having more leverage and thus being more sensitive in trimming the sub given a particular volume of water being exchanged from the fore/aft tanks. For eg. If the trim tanks were 500 mls, 50mls, or 5mls, ....if 1ml of water was being exchanged from the fore to the aft tank, it would have the same net result on the trim regardless of tank size, given these tanks had the same distance between them. Am I wrong in this thinking ?
I would be interested in knowing if anybody has this type of system in their sub and what their experiences with it are. Throwing this topic out there for discussion.
Mylo
Comment