All the above is well
All the above is well and good, but when I was trying to get the ballast just right for the Trumpeter Seawolf, getting near "neutral bouyancy" was no big deal. The big deal was getting the sub to be consistently level when at rest. For example, I was able to get the boat to hover just inches below the water, but stern was noticably low in the water. As I fed air to the bag, the sub would rise, but the stern rose faster than the bow. Now, with the sail out of the water, the stern was too high. Pumping in even more air, the sub went to the waterline and very level in the water.
What seems to be coming into play is the different weight distributions of components in the WTC fore and aft, above and below thw waterline at any given depth.
Anyway, with bits of lead and bits of foam, after maddening sessions in the tub, I eventually got the sub consistently level at various depths.
Note that all this is at static conditions -no forward motion - and that the APC unit would likely level the sub out when underway even if bouyancy distribution wasn't "perfect".
Another prob with the bag system was inconsistent bag geometry and an air pump that blasts way too much air in a burst to get any precision in depth control. I think that could be improved by plugging the air feed line and then drilling a very small hole (#80 drill or even smaller)in the plug, creating a low flow orifice. The other "fix" is wrapping the bag with a pressure plate and rubbe bands to better control inflation and deflation geometry. Have done both and I can actually get about 1/2" depth resolution in the bathtub. Don't know if this means anything in the real world when the sub is actually moving and you can control depth with dive planes, but it's cool to see in the tub.
All the above is well and good, but when I was trying to get the ballast just right for the Trumpeter Seawolf, getting near "neutral bouyancy" was no big deal. The big deal was getting the sub to be consistently level when at rest. For example, I was able to get the boat to hover just inches below the water, but stern was noticably low in the water. As I fed air to the bag, the sub would rise, but the stern rose faster than the bow. Now, with the sail out of the water, the stern was too high. Pumping in even more air, the sub went to the waterline and very level in the water.
What seems to be coming into play is the different weight distributions of components in the WTC fore and aft, above and below thw waterline at any given depth.
Anyway, with bits of lead and bits of foam, after maddening sessions in the tub, I eventually got the sub consistently level at various depths.
Note that all this is at static conditions -no forward motion - and that the APC unit would likely level the sub out when underway even if bouyancy distribution wasn't "perfect".
Another prob with the bag system was inconsistent bag geometry and an air pump that blasts way too much air in a burst to get any precision in depth control. I think that could be improved by plugging the air feed line and then drilling a very small hole (#80 drill or even smaller)in the plug, creating a low flow orifice. The other "fix" is wrapping the bag with a pressure plate and rubbe bands to better control inflation and deflation geometry. Have done both and I can actually get about 1/2" depth resolution in the bathtub. Don't know if this means anything in the real world when the sub is actually moving and you can control depth with dive planes, but it's cool to see in the tub.

Comment