Ideas of a newb - or folly of the inexperianced

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lakesactor
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2006
    • 5

    #1

    Ideas of a newb - or folly of the inexperianced

    Greetings all. First an introduction, I am new to R/C submarine-ing, meaning my fleet is composed of a single Albacore currently sitting in ‘the Yard’ just finished installing the bulkheads in the pressure hull, and am working on fleshing out the tail cone ( going with the stock Phase 2). The rest are Targets, two Aussi II sailboats a criss craft and two “turbo Vee”s

    That aside I’m also a bit of a brainstorm-er, coming up with odd idea’s for systems and build up’s most not coming to life due to lack of fiscal backing. I wanted to share some of my ideas with the community, maybe some one would like to try them out.

    The first I call a “crash dive generator” I kind of based this idea on the footage I’ve seen of subs when they need to do a quick dive and all the free crew run to the bow compartments. It struck me when I was looking at the design of a “piston ballast tank” would it be to improbably to mount some of the ballast on a length of full thread. Attach the full thread to a small motor controlled by a ballast pump speed controller (independent of the palest pump) set some lock nuts on the full thread to limit the motion of the weight and use a guide to keep the weight from free spinning. The goal is to upset the balance of the craft to “crash dive” defiantly not a system to try on the Albacore as it is not a deep diver.

    another other idea is more of a question. Has any one tried to make “unlikely submersibles”? this idea came from a combination of the latest Harry Potter film and the Pirates of the Caribbean 2. Basically I’m thinking of an ‘inexpensive” plastic model of a Gallon or other ‘tall ship’ full rigging (minus sails) that ‘at the flip of a switch’ has the masts flatten back and goes under. Probably would be a DIY hull as it would be a bear to A) find a plastic “tall ship” B) give it sub water line control surfaces.

    Finally (for now) vacu-formed hulls; I know the argument against vacu-formed WTC’s but what is wrong with vacu-formed hulls? Pretty simple rig to construct, Follow the link to a page I found a while back. Still have this particular project on back burner (I think it would rock for paint-ball) http://www.studiocreations.com/howto/stormtrooper/

    Any way, thank you for your time. Member ship with the committee is merely a paycheck away
  • raalst
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2003
    • 1229

    #2
    nice vac-forming link !

    nice vac-forming link !

    Comment

    • anonymous

      #3
      Hi,

      Lovely web link. I'm going

      Hi,

      Lovely web link. I'm going to be the first Stormtrooper in our village!

      Ballast shifting yes indeed. I haven't tried it but it is mentioned in Norbert Bruggens book. He suggests shifting the batteries. They are a necessary and useful weight.

      I have seen sailing ships keeling over and sinking in model fighting displays. They use our pumped ballast technoogy. It is particularyly impressive when they reverse the process and rise from the depths!

      I wonder about vacuum formed hulls - will they be strong enough? Model submarines are very heavy and get easily damaged when transporting or in dings with targets. (The keels of model yachts are a particular problem.) Ouch.

      Enjoy the hobby!

      David

      Comment

      • lakesactor
        Junior Member
        • Sep 2006
        • 5

        #4
        i'd think a vacu-formed hull

        i'd think a vacu-formed hull would be more resistant to nicks and dings because of the forgiving nature of the plastice ( more flexible then glass. stifiner rings could be "jig- sawed" out of a harder material to give it more ridgidity. my main concern is details. would the vacu-forming capture little details like weld lines, venting ports, or bunnies? i just find the links ^_^ havent tried the procces.

        Comment

        Working...