Attention all registered users. The new forum upgrade requires you to reset your password as you logon for the first time.
To reset your password choose this option that is displayed when you attempted to login with your username: "Forgotten your password? Click here!"
You will be sent an e-mail to the address that is associated with your forum account. Follow the simple directions to reset your password.
If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
It's just that most of the comments I heard about the "Sword of the Seas" were complaints from people who thought]http://www.subcommittee.com/forum/icon_question.gif[/img]
Pat "not trying to make trouble, just wanna have fun" Regan
There were quite few boats left out of the poll, mainly Nautilus variations.
Put simply, the ones that I didn't include were left out because they generally failed to move people or stick in the mind.
I think the poll broadly represented sci-fi and movie subs, and the fact that the ABC Nautilus- surely the best Nautilus design since the Goff version- didn't post a single vote proves my point.
Subculture, I understand that you couldn't include all variations of the Nautilus in your poll and you left out one of the THE most famous submarine in the movie industry. (Hint, it's Yellow.) But I voted for the Disney Nautilus myself. []
As for the the Sword of the Ocean Nautilus. I got out my LXG DVD last night and studied the images of the Sword of Ocean. It's a pretty neat looking submarine. I think that the rearend treatment was butt ugly with the pinecone props and the three overhanging rudders. Some of the pictures that I looked at tho, it was pretty cool that the Sword of the Ocean sort of looked like a huge sperm whale. Kinda like the way the Disney Nautilus looked like a giant fish. As for the size and interior of the LXG Nautilus, have you seen the size and interior of a luxury cruise ship lately?? The LXG Nautilus is pretty spartan by comparision.
I think the poll broadly represented sci-fi and movie subs, and the fact that the ABC Nautilus- surely the best Nautilus design since the Goff version- didn't post a single vote proves my point.
Andy,
You and I both know that we're on the same page in regards to our opinions of this (awesome) sub design.
Plans are in the works to R/C one, but I'll be darned if I can figure a way to get that scale high waterline with so much hull up there. I'm thinking I'll have to settle for a dynamic diver, probably pulled down with thrusters. I've got two other projects to finish up first, so I've got lots of time to think on it.
In regards to the LXG sub... I could have lived with a different design. It's alright, but waaaaay overdone. I tjust didn't seem to fit with the time period at all (cruise missiles? Come on, people!).
The Nautilus Drydocks - Exceptional Products for the World of R/C Submarines - www.nautilusdrydocks.com
[quote]but I'll be darned if I can figure a way to get that scale high waterline with so much hull up there.
How about adding some air bladders concealed behind bottom hull plates that can be inflated and protrude from the bottom to lift the model to the desired waterline once on the surface.
They would be concealed the rest of the time to give that scale apperance. Sort of like the float on Chitty Chitty Bang Bang or the float around the Apollo space capsule but hidden bellow the boats outline.
but I'll be darned if I can figure a way to get that scale high waterline with so much hull up there.
How about adding some air bladders concealed behind bottom hull plates that can be inflated and protrude from the bottom to lift the model to the desired waterline once on the surface.
They would be concealed the rest of the time to give that scale apperance. Sort of like the float on Chitty Chitty Bang Bang or the float around the Apollo space capsule but hidden bellow the boats outline.
Scott
Fitting airbags underneath would decrease the metacentric height, which would almost certainly make the boat less stable.
Plus it wouldn't look the part IMHO.
I've discussed this with Bob offline, and I think the solution lies in placing valves in the free flood sections.
This way the boat would be effectively a dry hull boat when at the surface waterline, until opening the valves result in the areas around the wtc free flooding. This could take the boat down to a more managable waterline, whereupon a smaller ballast system (gas, piston tank etc.) mounted inside the WTC could take over buoyancy control.
A centrifugal pump could be used to pump out the water when wishing to return to scale(!) waterline, as it isn't required to work against pressure. Alternatively compressed air could be pressed into service although this would require an air receiver which could result in more bulk.
I was thinking if there was not enough internal space to float it high enough on ballast tanks then air bags (3 or 4) positioned to form stable legs would push the boat skyward to the desired waterline.
Is the ABC Nautilus the one that resembles a horseshoe crab?
In this version of Captain Nemos Nautilus he has probably installed his high speed surface travel hydro-planes.
As I recall (imagine ) they extend down on legs when in use. ]
Comment