Has anyone tried this? - Water-proof test method

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • captain nemo12
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2003
    • 279

    Has anyone tried this? - Water-proof test method

    Hello all,

    After reading Helmut Berghaus' website (chap who built a Krick U-25), I found out about his method of testing the water-proofness of his sub's hull (I assume the Krick kit doesn't not have a wtc, the hull is a dry compartment; dryhull) he did this by installing a syringe on top of the wtc cover and a bike valve on another side of the wtc. By using a bike pump and pumping air into the wtc through the bike valve, the air fills up the compartment and eventually builds up pressure to push the syringe piston outward, indicating that there is no air escaping out. However, if the the opposite happens, it means that air can escape out. My thinking]http://www.subcommittee.com/forum/icon_biggrin.gif[/img]

    Wonder if anyone has ever tried this and proven that it is useful. I have a 4 ft long u-boat to be tested and a bathtub might be too small to test it in. I just want to know if this is useful in testing the wtc on dry land, without getting your feet wet (I like getting my feet wet, this is an exception... nearest lake or pond is 4 miles away from my house )

    Thanks for any help!

    Link to Helmut Berghaus's website:http://home.wxs.nl/~bergh601/submarine/index-en.html
  • tmsmalley
    SubCommittee Member
    • Feb 2003
    • 2376

    #2
    Air leaking slowly out of

    Air leaking slowly out of a pressurized WTC doesn't necessarily prove it will leak water.

    On an RC submarine, the pressure is on the outside not the inside. In fact some watertight compartments (most?) need the pressure of the water pressing on the top plate forcing it down onto the gasket to create the seal.

    Comment

    • bob the builder
      Former SC President
      • Feb 2003
      • 1364

      #3
      I suppose it would be

      I suppose it would be more effective to suck the air out of the WTC to create a vacuum inside the WTC. That's what I did to test my WTC after I got a small leak at one of the power terminals. I sucked the air out through my antenna tube, and then quickly plugged it off again. I'm not sure what the vacuum registered at, but it was pretty significant. I then stuck it underwater for an hour or so to check if it leaked. It did, and I could see the droplet trail leading right to the culprit.
      The Nautilus Drydocks - Exceptional Products for the World of R/C Submarines - www.nautilusdrydocks.com

      Comment

      • captain nemo12
        Junior Member
        • Sep 2003
        • 279

        #4
        Thanks for that advice guys,

        Thanks for that advice guys, sometimes air can go through spaces water cannot penetrate in, I figured that if one could do his best to seal the wtc from air getting in/out, water would have a much less chance of getting through. But could this method still be trusted in testing the wtc?

        Comment

        • carcharadon
          Junior Member
          • Feb 2003
          • 301

          #5
          I use watertight chambers made

          I use watertight chambers made of PVC pipe. There are only wires going into and out of it. Whenever I work on the components I check to see if there are any leaks by pressurizing the watertight chamber and looking for leaks by putting it in the bathtub. There are actually bubbles coming through the insulation over the wires. I generally put a drop of superglue over the ends of the exposed wire. I have installed a valve stem from an automotive tire. I use a bicycle pump to pump it up a couple of times. Probably 25 psi. If there are no leaks it goes back in the sub. Method works good, subs have been deep (30ft) no leaks.



          Edited By Carcharadon on 1110500733

          Comment

          Working...
          X