Test

[tmsmalley]

The right side of this rare picture of Simon Lake's Argonaut Junior is [no longer]cut off (with my current screen resolution),
Thanks for the upgrade Ronald!

[raalst]

Re: Test

[PaulC]

Re: Test

I would not have gotten in that thing...

[Larry Kuntz]

Re: Test

All it needs is the moon on the door.

[tmsmalley]

Re: Test

That photo of Argonaut Junior is full side to side now. This side image shows that there was no drive chain on the port side.

BUT now the rotating SC logo in the banner is squashed top to bottom (not spherical). I might still have the original file at home if you need it.

[raalst]

Re: Test

that being squashed is a feature of the board, not your picture.

I'll have another go at it. it is all interesting new stuff.
in this case CSS (Cascading Style Sheets), a way to arrange layout of html..

[tmsmalley]

Re: Test

No longer squashed rotating SC logo Ronald, my creation is happy - Good work!!!

[tmsmalley]

Re: Test



USS Alligator in operation.


2800 pixels 200 DPI Seems to be fine - no cut off!

[raalst]

Re: Test

some more tests

[raalst]

Re: Test

yet another test

no luck with photobucket callbacks yet.

[raalst]

Re: Test

[tmsmalley]

Re: Test

I can see side-to-side if I use the scrollbar at the bottom.

[raalst]

Re: Test

photobucket now fills in the URL automatically too

[tmsmalley]

Re: Test

Neither Imageshack or Photobucket will allow me to maximize their windows.

[raalst]

Re: Test

for photobucket it won't help, because they set the size themselves to a fixed size.
you can of course open up a window to photobucket yourself and cut/paste the URL's
from that window into the posting. the stuff under the button "photobucket" is fixed.

Imageshack is still not how I like it.

is this resizing issue the same as your post about being able to scroll side to side ?
I need to understand what you mean by it. do you mean window too small
or are you pleased with being able to scroll ? for which hostingparty does that behavior show ?
and, which browser are you using ?

Thanks & Regards,
Ronald