How come subs are slower when running surfaced as compared to running fully submerged? Take the case of the LA class, their surface speed is about 20 knot's while submerged it's 30 knots ++.
Speed difference
Collapse
X
-
Tags: None
-
Re: Speed difference
How come subs are slower when running surfaced as compared to running fully submerged? Take the case of the LA class, their surface speed is about 20 knot's while submerged it's 30 knots ++.
Or at least that is what my buddy's who are bubble heads said.
Andre
-
As I understand it, on
As I understand it, on the surface part of the energy put into propulsion is converted into making waves.
Under water it is not (or much less), so propulsion is more efficient.
Try it: you can swim faster under water than on the surface. Thats why it is prohibited in competitive swimming.
Comment
-
As I understand it, on
[quote]As I understand it, on the surface part of the energy put into propulsion is converted into making waves.
Under water it is not (or much less), so propulsion is more efficient.
Try it]
But most swimmers often spend a significant portion of their race underwater doing the dolphin kick. Is there some rule that forces the swimmer to surface by a certain point?
Comment
-
Speed is determined by hull
Speed is determined by hull design, horsepower, prop design and several other related factors. Todays subs are designed to be more efficient running submerged than surfaced.
Take a look at the GATO Class: surfaced speed 21 knots form 5400 hp; submerged speed 9 knots from 2740 hp. Early subs were designed primarily as surface ships that could operate under water.
The LA class produces about 35,000 hp to go 25 knots surfaced or 30+ submerged. Modern (late 1950's) subs are designed as true subs, that sometimes operate on the surface.
Comment
Comment