NEW COMMENTS BY EB PRESIDENT - Some bad news (maybe). Some good.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • u-5075
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2003
    • 1134

    #1

    NEW COMMENTS BY EB PRESIDENT - Some bad news (maybe). Some good.

    NEW COMMENTS BY EB PRESIDENT.

    Abstracted from AP article by Matt Apuzzo
    Titled "EB president]
    The president of submarine builder Electric Boat said Wednesday that he will consider moving more than 1,500 repair jobs out of Connecticut if the submarine base in Groton is closed. If the Base Closure and Realignment Commission approves the closure next week, John P. Casey said it's unlikely the Navy would send submarines to Connecticut for lengthy repairs and upgrades. "I'd have to make a decision to either discontinue that line of work or attempt to uproot and relocate the business to where the work is," Casey said during a conference call with Connecticut politicians Wednesday.

    [But shipbuilding to stay in Connecticut and RI.]
    Casey said the company likely would keep its shipbuilding operations in Connecticut and Rhode Island even if the base closes because the Navy doesn't buy enough submarines each year to make it sensible to invest in a costly move. Casey estimated that 1,500 to 2,200 Connecticut employees work on submarine repairs.

    "If the Navy decides to move the location of the sub force, we as a business have one primary customer and that's the U.S. Navy. We'll do what we have to do to support the Navy," he said. Since the Pentagon announced its intention to close the submarine base this spring, EB officials have been guarded about the company's future plans.

    Supporters of the base, including several retired submarine admirals, have repeatedly argued that closing the base will make the U.S. more vulnerable, as countries such as China increase their submarine fleets. Veteran submarines have said that the country should maintain a fleet of 50 or more subs. Some Navy projections predict the force will dwindle into the 30s.

    Dodd and U.S. Rep. Rob Simmons, R-Conn., have said that by closing the base, the Pentagon is trying to avoid a congressional debate on the future size of the submarine fleet. With fewer piers available, they say, their fleet must shrink.
  • tom dougherty
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2005
    • 1361

    #2
    More today in the New

    More today in the New London Day on the proposed closing]Hastert Joins Chorus Calling For Sub Base To Be Saved[/b]
    U.S. House speaker one of highest-profile backers


    By ANTHONY CRONIN
    Day Staff Writer, Business
    Published on 8/19/2005

    The speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives is calling on the federal base-closure commission to overturn a Pentagon plan to close the Naval Submarine Base in Groton, saying there are no real cost savings associated with its shutdown.

    House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert, a Republican from Illinois, also said that closing the submarine base would “eliminate a center of excellence for undersea warfare” in which Congress has invested hundreds of millions of dollars over the past decade.

    The letter, released Thursday, from Hastert to Anthony Principi, chairman of the federal Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission, was welcomed by those fighting the proposed base shutdown.

    U.S. Rep. Rob Simmons, R-2nd District, along with Gov. M. Jodi Rell and U.S. Sens. Christopher Dodd and Joseph Lieberman, said Hastert's support raises more questions about the Pentagon's financial analysis of the shutdown. Simmons said Hastert's letter, along with those already sent to BRAC commissioners from other high-ranking national and military officials with no direct interest in the base, “adds yet another important voice in the growing movement against closing Groton.”

    Hastert told Principi that one of the strongest arguments against the base shutdown is recent data that calls into question the Navy's claims of substantial costs savings if the base's fleet of fast-attack submarines and related commands were moved to naval bases in Kings Bay, Ga., and Norfolk, Va.

    Connecticut officials fighting to keep the base open say the shutdown would cost the nation $641 million over a 20-year timeframe, in stark contrast to Navy claims of savings of as much as $1.6 billion. “As a fiscal conservative, I cannot support a base closing that does not provide taxpayer savings,” Hastert told Principi in his two-page letter.

    Sub base supporters also were buoyed on Thursday by a supplemental Pentagon report to the BRAC commission that admits that a “synergy” exists between the Electric Boat shipyard in Groton and the nearby submarine base.

    The report, prepared by the Undersecretary of Defense's infrastructure steering group, said “the synergies between New London and Electric Boat are recognized; however, the overall cost savings of the recommendations (to close the base) cannot be ignored.

    There's more on the Day website. The New London Sub Base was the founding site of the SubCommitee, and hosted the Regattas up through 9/11.
    Tom

    Comment

    Working...
    X