Lower-frequency video transmission? - Tricky ...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bradv
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2004
    • 129

    #1

    Lower-frequency video transmission? - Tricky ...

    Hi All,

    Just wondering if anyone has any experience with transmitting wireless video from underwater at 900MHz? This frequency is substantially lower than the common 2.4GHz video transmitters available which won't work u/w, but I'm hoping that as R/F attenuation through water decreases with frequency, reception at 900MHz may be possible with a relatively-powerful signal (800mW).

    Any thoughts? Yes, I realize that this aim is difficult to achieve. Even a few feet would be nice
  • wadester13
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2004
    • 56

    #2
    I am building my sub

    I am building my sub from the real thing. I was on a sub for 4 1/2 years. The video is mainly to look at stuff above the water line. It may be neat to see under water but if you run in a pond you wont see anything. I may be wrong on this. If you want to 'see' under the water try working on prefecting sonar!

    Comment

    • bradv
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2004
      • 129

      #3
      As my sub is a

      As my sub is a Dumas Akula and thus relatively small (88cm), it'll mainly be run in pools and at a shallow depth in lakes - littoral combat So I should get good video visibility in these situations - I just need to make sure the 900MHz video signal can punch its way back out of the water.

      Comment

      • Guest

        #4
        Brad,
        If you're only running at

        Brad,
        If you're only running at shallow depths, why not put the camera in the sail, with a tall antenna which will be above the water? I have a 1.2Gh CCTV in the sail of my L.A. I can read an uderwater sign on the end of my 40ft pool on my video monitor. In the lakes, visibility is only a few feet, because of the lack of water clarity. See picture on my SC homepage, and videos on my web site]Art Broder's Models[/url]. Go to Documents, and view videos. You may have to join the group, (free) to see the videos.
        Art

        Comment

        • scott t
          Member
          • Feb 2003
          • 880

          #5
          How about designing a retractable

          How about designing a retractable float antenna for when video is wanted?

          Comment

          • ramius-ii
            Junior Member
            • Apr 2003
            • 393

            #6
            Hi Brad]http://www.subcommittee.com/forum/icon_smile.gif

            Hi Brad]http://www.subcommittee.com/forum/icon_smile.gif[/img]

            Comment

            • interpol
              Junior Member
              • Mar 2004
              • 47

              #7
              Make sure that you are

              Make sure that you are licensed to operate whichever frequency you choose. If you are in the US, in the 1.2Ghz range I do believe that you need an Amateur Radio Operator's license, and your output power, since it is a remote controlled vehicle, will probably fall under the category to be limited to 1 watt.

              Comment

              Working...
              X