Question on how underwater rc control works

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • researcher
    Junior Member
    • Oct 2017
    • 2

    #1

    Question on how underwater rc control works

    Hi everyone. I am a graduate student at the University of Nevada, Reno in Reno, NV. I am currently doing a research project for underwater Virtual Reality. I need to control a phone while underwater and found out that Bluetooth signals don't work well underwater. I was wondering if anyone could help me to understand how normally subs that go into the deep end of the pool are controlled and what kind of gear is used. Thanks!
  • subdude
    Official Peon
    • Feb 2003
    • 682

    #2
    Bluetooth operates in the 2.4 GHz frequency range, which is far too high to penetrate water. This is why the current Radio Control gear is useless to the submarine world, it also is on 2.4 GHz. To penetrate water, you need a much lower (slower) frequency rate. Most of us in the US use 75 MHz equipment, which used to be the "standard" for ground vehicle operations in the USA. Other countries use 40 MHz, 50 MHz, etc.

    In order to use 2.4 GHz, you'll need to trail an antenna to the surface. This can be tricky, as the specs for a 2.4 GHz antenna are quite particular, and require shielded coax for all but the last several inches. Whatever device you use underwater will need to be manufactured to utilize an extended antenna.

    Jim
    SubCommittee member #0069 (since the dawn of time.....)

    Comment

    • David F
      SubCommittee Member
      • Jan 2016
      • 60

      #3
      A number of us are also now using openLRS on 433 Mhz (458 Mhz here in the UK). Pioneered by Tim on here:



      It works well for several feet of (fresh) water on the Goldilocks principle - frequency not TOO high and bandwidth ABLE to cope with frequency hopping and error checking!

      David

      Comment

      • tommydeen
        Member
        • Nov 2003
        • 327

        #4
        Orrrr find and old 75 mghz set up. I wouldn't wast my time on 2.4 gig it's useless in subs
        sigpic. You have to ask yourself one question...would the admiral approve

        Comment

        • researcher
          Junior Member
          • Oct 2017
          • 2

          #5
          Wow. Thanks for the great advice! Wireless seems to be very hard to deal with for underwater phone usage. I will probably have to look into waterproof phones, wires, and controllers. It's unfortunate that nobody has made easily accessible alternatives for bluetooth that you just hit a button on a phone and you're live.

          Comment

          • tommydeen
            Member
            • Nov 2003
            • 327

            #6
            Originally posted by researcher View Post
            Wow. Thanks for the great advice! Wireless seems to be very hard to deal with for underwater phone usage. I will probably have to look into waterproof phones, wires, and controllers. It's unfortunate that nobody has made easily accessible alternatives for bluetooth that you just hit a button on a phone and you're live.
            Not for blue tooth for reasons stated above by subdude. And since 75 mghz is no longer mfged we in the hobby of subs have taken a big step backwards.... 433 and 915 being the exception.
            sigpic. You have to ask yourself one question...would the admiral approve

            Comment

            Working...
            X